![]() This report did not make a very strong case for the need to go to 40TeV. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on SSC Physics, SSC-250/Rev., Dec. ![]() Presentation by Don Edwards at the HEPAP Meeting, Jan. Report of the SSC Collider Dipole Review Panel, eds.Riordan, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 32, Part 1, 125 (2001). For a detailed discussion on the two-culture syndrome at the SSCL, see M.It was this organization that was presented to HEPAP at HEPAP's first meeting on the SSC site, on January 4.A generous way to summarize their opinions about Sverdrup staff at the SSC would be to say that they were not very competent and rather uninterested. Everyone I talked to who was at the SSC during its early Texas days agreed that the Sverdrup partnership was a disaster.Wojcicki dated August 23, 1989, and Wojcicki's response of August 31. Knapp, URA President, to the staff of the URA/SSC Central Design Group, dated Janu. McDaniel's handwritten notes from the September 27,1988, interviews at the CDG (from the Cornell archives) and comments made to the author by some of the interviewees.S. Wojcicki, Reviews of Accelerator Science and Technology 1 (World Scientific, 2008) pp.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |